Comapring date fields

I am trying to compare two date fields; one is a string and one is a getdate() field. I am trying to get them into the same format so I can compare them. What am I doing wrong? :eek:

select convert(integer, substring(loc_86, 1, 2)) as tmonth,
convert(integer, substring(loc_86, 3, 2)) as tday,
convert(integer, '20'+right(loc_86, 2)) as tyear,
datepart(month, (dateadd(day, -1, (getdate())))) as ymonth,
datepart(day, (dateadd(day, -1, (getdate())))) as yesterday,
datepart(year, (dateadd(day, -1, (getdate())))) as yyear
from ub_chg_tbl join ubmast_tbl
on (ubmast_tbl.patient_nbr = ub_chg_tbl.patient_nbr)
where tmonth = ymonth and tday = yesterday and ty= yyeartry this as a template:


declare @.str char(06)
select @.str = '060228' -- Feb 28 2006
select convert(datetime,@.str)|||How about

where convert(varchar(10), dateadd (dd, -1, getdate()), 101) = loc_86

Depending on your delimiter, of course.|||How closely do you want to compare them? Getdate() returns results in milliseconds. Are you just trying to match on the day?|||I'm only trying to match the day.

When I use this script:

Convert(VarChar(12),GetDate(),112) as '112'

I get a date in a format of YYMMDD.

I need the date in the format of MMDDYY. How can I do this?|||Open BOL. Search the index for CONVERT. Read the topic "CAST and CONVERT". All the formats are given there.|||There is not a format listed for MMDDYY. Is this really not possible? :shocked:|||You should NOT be storing date values as strings. Possibly the most common noob DBA mistake of all time. I strongly urge you to change your datetype to datetime.

That said, this should work for you:select *
from YourTable
where datediff(day, getdate(), convert(datetime, left(DateString,2) + '-' + substring(DateString, 3, 2) + '-' + right(DateString,2), 10)) = 0|||I wish we could change it. We are in healthcare and this database is federally regulated, so we are not allowed to change the format of the fields.|||Now I am receiving this error:

The conversion of a char data type to a datetime data type resulted in an out-of-range datetime value.|||Because you have an invalid date in your table, because you are not using datetime datatypes.

Format your datestring as 'YYYY-MM-DD' and run it through the ISDATE() function to find the bad records.|||There is not a format listed for MMDDYY. Is this really not possible? :shocked:SELECT Replace(Convert(VARCHAR(10), GetDate(), 1), '/', '')-PatP|||Now I am receiving this error:

The conversion of a char data type to a datetime data type resulted in an out-of-range datetime value.As Sallah once told Indy: Bad Dates.

The following shows how to weed them out relatively painlessly:CREATE TABLE #patp_date_demo (patp_date CHAR(6))

INSERT INTO #patp_date_demo (patp_date)
SELECT '122505' UNION
SELECT '022900' UNION
SELECT '022901' UNION
SELECT '063104' UNION
SELECT '131211'

SELECT patp_date
FROM #patp_date_demo
WHERE 0 = IsDate(Stuff(Stuff(patp_date, 5, 0, '-'), 3, 0, '-'))

DROP TABLE #ptp_date_demo-PatP|||Thanks so much! The following script worked:

REPLACE(CONVERT(varchar(10), DATEADD(day, - 1, GETDATE()), 1), '/', '') AS Yesterday

Comapre two values in same resultsets

Hi

I want to compare values of two fields in same resultset. Like I have resultset whrre there are two fields Frequency and New_Frequency I want to compare this two like if

Frequency = New_Frequency then do some logic.

I tried with derived columun using Frequency == New_NewFrequency but it doesn't work.

Let me know is there any way to compare?

Dnyandeo

for derived column use in such a way

a = case when frequency = new_frequency then

begin

some logic

end

else

some logic

end

end

or can u send me the script code that u had used for derived column?

Column By Column Comparison

SQL Server 2000

I will to compare a normal table with a replicated audit table having
identical columns. I wish to report on the differences between the
data.

How can I loop though a "column list" in TSQL rather than explicitly
naming each column to compare ?

Thanks,
CraigDo you just want to know if there IS a difference or what sort of
difference ?

--For the Whole Table
SELECT checksum_agg(binary_checksum(*)) from SomeTable

--For just the rows
Select binary_checksum(*) from SomeTable

If you need more granualarity, then it would be more work.

HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.|||Jens,

This is not 100% reliable. If the checksum functions are
different, there must be a difference in the tables, but the
converse is not true. The checksum functions can return the
same values on different data, like any hash function.

The only sure way is to compare column by column values.

Steve Kass
Drew University

Jens wrote:
> Do you just want to know if there IS a difference or what sort of
> difference ?
> --For the Whole Table
> SELECT checksum_agg(binary_checksum(*)) from SomeTable
> --For just the rows
> Select binary_checksum(*) from SomeTable
> If you need more granualarity, then it would be more work.
> HTH, Jens Suessmeyer.|||Yes I agree with you, definitely. But as I said, to have more
granularity and more reliabilty you have to use another mechanism which
causes more coding. but as I said, I am with you.

Jens Suessmeyer.|||Thanks for the reply.

I have to interrogate each column and determine which is different and
then report on the difference. I was thinking more in the lines of
looping through the columns collection somehow without having to know
the name of each column ...

Thanks again !|||(csomberg@.dwr.com) writes:
> SQL Server 2000
> I will to compare a normal table with a replicated audit table having
> identical columns. I wish to report on the differences between the
> data.
> How can I loop though a "column list" in TSQL rather than explicitly
> naming each column to compare ?

You can get the columns for a table with

SELECT name FROM syscolumns WHERE id = object_name('tbl')

I would suggest that it is best to generate the SQL statement from client
code, since client languages are better apt for string manipulation. You
can build SQL strings in T-SQL as well, and exeute them with EXEC() or
sp_executesql, but this is bulkier.

If you want to be static, one option is to use a client-language to
generate a stored procedure.

Keep in mind that you cannot just say:

SELECT ...
FROM tbl a
JOIN audit_tbl b ON a.keycol = b.keycol
WHERE a.col1 <> b.col1
AND a.col2 <> b.col2
...

Correct is:

WHERE (a.col1 <> b.col1 OR
a.col1 IS NULL AND b.col1 IS NOT NULL OR
a.col1 IS NOT NULL AND b.col1 IS NULL)
AND

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@.sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin.../2000/books.asp|||On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:51:02 +0000 (UTC), Erland Sommarskog wrote:

(snip)
>Keep in mind that you cannot just say:
> SELECT ...
> FROM tbl a
> JOIN audit_tbl b ON a.keycol = b.keycol
> WHERE a.col1 <> b.col1
> AND a.col2 <> b.col2
> ...
>Correct is:
> WHERE (a.col1 <> b.col1 OR
> a.col1 IS NULL AND b.col1 IS NOT NULL OR
> a.col1 IS NOT NULL AND b.col1 IS NULL)
> AND

Hi Erland,

This can be (slightly) simplified to

WHERE (NULLIF (a.col1, b.col1) IS NOT NULL OR
NULLIF (b.col1, a.col1) IS NOT NULL)
AND

Best, Hugo
--

(Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)|||Hugo Kornelis (hugo@.pe_NO_rFact.in_SPAM_fo) writes:
> This can be (slightly) simplified to
> WHERE (NULLIF (a.col1, b.col1) IS NOT NULL OR
> NULLIF (b.col1, a.col1) IS NOT NULL)
> AND

Simplified in the sense "few characters to type, yes". Else I'm not
sure that I find it simpler. Or it is just that it's Friday night after
a hard and long working week...

--
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, esquel@.sommarskog.se

Books Online for SQL Server SP3 at
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/techin.../2000/books.asp|||On Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:14:32 +0000 (UTC), Erland Sommarskog wrote:

>Hugo Kornelis (hugo@.pe_NO_rFact.in_SPAM_fo) writes:
>> This can be (slightly) simplified to
>>
>> WHERE (NULLIF (a.col1, b.col1) IS NOT NULL OR
>> NULLIF (b.col1, a.col1) IS NOT NULL)
>> AND
>Simplified in the sense "few characters to type, yes". Else I'm not
>sure that I find it simpler. Or it is just that it's Friday night after
>a hard and long working week...

Hi Erland,

Well, okay. It's an acquired taste, I'll have to grant you that. :-)

Best, Hugo
--

(Remove _NO_ and _SPAM_ to get my e-mail address)|||SELECT X.a, X.b, ... X.z
FROM
(SELECT a, .b, ... z
FROM AuditData
UNION ALL
SELECT a, b, ... z
FROM BaseData)
AS X (a, b, ... z)
GROUP BY X.a, X.b, ... X.z
HAVING COUNT(*) < 2;

or if we had SQL-92 set operators, you could write:

SELECT *
FROM (SELECT 'B', * FROM BaseData)
EXCEPT
(SELECT 'A' , * FROM AuditData);

or
SELECT *
FROM (SELECT 'A', * FROM AuditData)
EXCEPT
(SELECT 'B' , * FROM BaseData);|||if the table has a PK, there is no need to do tedios column-by-colmn
comparisons:

create table t1(i int identity, j int)
insert into t1(j) values(1)
insert into t1(j) values(2)
insert into t1(j) values(3)

create table t2(i int identity, j int)
insert into t2(j) values(1)
insert into t2(j) values(2)
insert into t2(j) values(4)

-- rows in t1 that do not have exact match in t2
select * from t1 t
-- there is a row in t2 with the same PK
where exists(select * from t2 where t2.i = t.i)
-- but some other columns are different
and
(select count(*) from
(
select * from t1
union
select * from t2
)t_both where t_both.i = t.i
) = 2

-- rows in t2 that do not have exact match in t1
select * from t2 t
-- there is a row in t1 with the same PK
where exists(select * from t1 where t1.i = t.i)
-- but some other columns are different
and
(select count(*) from
(
select * from t1
union
select * from t2
)t_both where t_both.i = t.i
) = 2

drop table t1
drop table t2|||Thank you all for the updates and I am sorry I did not get back sooner.

I need to do column bu column comparisons as the "report" has to show
which data elements have changed and from what to what ... yuk.

I do not think I can do this efficiently in SQL so I was thinking of
writing a quick little app to loop through column collections of the
recordset ...